Oil Price Collapse: Who Placed Their Bets Before Trump?
As Donald Trump ramps up messages on Truth Social to de-escalate tensions with Tehran, massive capital flows recorded just moments before his posts are sending shockwaves throughout the financial world. Between colossal oil volumes, record stockmarket gains, and Iranian denials, suspicions of market manipulation are now squarely targeting the president's inner circle.
Coincidence often has a knack for business, but in finance, coincidence has its limits. This Monday, at 11:05 am, Donald Trump posted a message announcing "very fruitful discussions" with Iran and the postponement of strikes. The result was instantaneous: crude prices plummeted 13%. However, the real move was played 15 minutes earlier, during the dead calm that preceded the storm. Millions of Barrels Traded in the Dark
On the oil market, Monday's signal was impossible to miss. Brent crude dropped 13.5% in a matter of minutes, falling from $112 to under $100. According to the Financial Times, citing Bloomberg data, approximately 6,200 oil futures contracts were sold between 6:49 am and 6:50 am (New York time)—exactly 15 minutes before Trump reached for his phone.
At the same moment, a $1.5bn bet was placed on the S&P 500. According to The Kobeissi Letter, $60m in profits were made in the blink of an eye. These two massive bets, launched within the same 2-minute window while the rest of the world was still bracing for war, raise serious questions. Tehran Weighs In as the Blockchain Speaks
The story quickly moved beyond mere money. Hours after Trump's tweet, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, denied any negotiations. He went as far as accusing Washington of spreading "fake news" to manipulate crude prices. This version of events undermines American credibility, especially when looking at activity on betting sites like Polymarket.
For the record, one of the key features of these predictive platforms is that everything is etched into the blockchain. Every bet is public and timestamped to the second, leaving no room for doubt regarding the timing of transactions.
And this is where things get interesting. A technical analysis by the firm Bubblemaps flagged a group of 7 interconnected accounts that raked in over $1m in gains. This mystery bettor boasts an 83% success rate on military operations in Iran. They had already bet big on the June 2025 and February 2026 strikes, just minutes before official announcements. These movements, which on-chain experts (those analyzing data recorded on the blockchain) say look suspiciously like insider trading, even forced Polymarket to call in Palantir to help stem these information leaks.
This lack of transparency is souring the mood and fueling accusations. Representative Mike Levin pointed to Barron Trump's ties to Polymarket, where he reportedly sits on the advisory board. This proximity, coupled with rumors of massive investments by those close to power, has the opposition crying foul play over a conflict of interest at the highest levels of government. An Impossible SEC Investigation?
Naturally, given such anomalies, all eyes are on the Wall Street watchdog to take action, although regulatory efforts appear stalled by politics. A high-profile resignation at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 16 is reportedly linked to internal tensions over how to handle investigations into the president's entourage, according to information obtained by Reuters.
This is not an isolated incident. In April 2025, the announcement of a tariff suspension sent the Nasdaq up 12%, with highly suspicious volumes recorded just before the news broke. In response, lawmakers launched a petition in January 2026 to legally prohibit presidential families from holding stockmarket assets.
Pending a formal investigation, these movements are being politely referred to as "anomalies."
Palantir Technologies Inc. specializes in the development and marketing of software platforms for the large-scale analysis, integration and management of data, decisions and operations, as well as the execution of software in various environments.
Net sales break down by market between government institutions (53.7%) and commercial enterprises (46.3%).
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: the United States (74.2%), the United Kingdom (9.5%) and other (16.3%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.